Tractable Shape I

What if a buil­ding could shape itself de­pen­ding on the con­text where it is built!
This sta­te­ment might be hard to un­ders­tand in a phy­si­cal world, but let’s as­sume, for ins­tance, that it is a theo­re­ti­cal pro­blem. In fact, a buil­ding al­ways has to res­pond to cer­tain cons­traints due to the con­text whe­rein it is insc­ribe. In­deed, streets, su­rroun­ding buil­dings, mu­ni­ci­pa­li­ties’ ru­les and co­des, to­po­graphy, the pro­gram of the buil­ding (its use), etc. are the tip of the ice­berg of what an archi­tect has to deal with when he is de­sig­ning a building.

tractable-shape_01.jpg

My ob­jec­tive in the use of Mathe­ma­tica is to ex­plore the phe­no­me­non of an ac­cu­rate shape which could be re­mo­de­led ac­cor­ding to di­ver­gent con­texts where it is in­ser­ted. Ho­we­ver, struc­ture, space and en­ve­lope all have to be con­nec­ted to each other and react the same way. Thus, the ans­wer of that would be to de­fine a dis­tor­ting ou­ter shell which is lin­ked with the in­ner struc­ture and its in­ner space.

Conc­re­tely, I will ini­tiate this pro­blem by mo­dif­ying the ou­ter li­mits of any pat­tern or “struc­tu­red” shape in­side of some boun­da­ries with the ma­ni­pu­la­tion of a poly­gon with lo­ca­tors (this fist at­tempt will be done in two di­men­sions). One of the in­te­rests is then to keep an in­te­lli­gi­bi­lity of a shape or­ga­ni­za­tion in­side of the li­mit even though it is irre­gu­lar. It should then main­tain its beha­vior and rea­rrange itself pro­por­tio­nally with the new shape of the shell.

I will have then to in­sert a Ce­llu­lar Au­to­ma­ton with a ran­dom ini­tial con­di­tion into those boun­da­ries. They should the­re­fore react or re­cal­cu­late every time the boun­dary is chan­ging. The tricky part in this is that I have to fi­gure out how the cells that touches the li­mit are chan­ging co­lor whether they are in­side or ou­tside the li­mit. If the li­mit is mo­ving in­ward, every cells ou­tside will then turn white (0). If it is the op­po­site con­di­tion (the li­mit mo­ves out­ward) the Ce­llu­lar Au­to­ma­ton will re­cal­cu­late by ta­king in con­si­de­ra­tion that its neigh­bor has been chan­ged. This pro­blem ap­pears to ne­ver have been ex­pli­citly stu­died so I will pro­bably have to create a new func­tion for that.

The third step would be fi­nally, to trans­pose this in th­ree di­men­sions. It will then be­come more architectural.

tractable-shape_02.jpg

tractable-shape_03.jpg

tractable-shape_04.jpg

tractable-shape_05.jpg

3 Responses to “Tractable Shape I”


  1. 1 Open Form Architecture

    In­te­res­ting. A lot of po­ten­tial with this theory.
    Con­gra­tu­la­tion, that’s amazing.

    J.

  2. 2 eve

    in­tense.
    e.

  3. 3 Sabrina

    Hey Max and Mau­rice,
    That looks awe­some… so much po­ten­tial in the re­sults of this. I am won­de­ring how this maybe used in de­ve­lo­ping zo­ning en­ve­lo­pes for ur­ban plan­ning. Perhaps a new way of un­ders­tan­ding and crea­ting ru­les for city de­ve­lop­ment could be made from this? It is cool to think about at dif­fe­rent sca­les… even within a sin­gle fa­mily home, to as large as a giant of­fice buil­ding? It would be cool map new york city in this way, fi­gure out what the exis­ting en­ve­lope is and see how many dif­fe­rent (po­ten­tial) arran­ge­ments could be made in­side of it? Good luck!
    Sabrina

Leave a Reply